By JENNIFER C. YATES and SETH BORENSTEIN, Associated Press Writers
The head of a prominent cancer research institute issued an
unprecedented warning to his faculty and staff Wednesday: Limit cell
phone use because of the possible risk of cancer.
The warning from Dr. Ronald B. Herberman, director of the University
of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, is contrary to numerous studies that
don't find a link between cancer and cell phone use, and a public lack
of worry by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Herberman is basing his alarm on early unpublished data. He says it
takes too long to get answers from science and he believes people
should take action now — especially when it comes to children.
"Really at the heart of my concern is that we shouldn't wait for a
definitive study to come out, but err on the side of being safe rather
than sorry later," Herberman said.
No other major academic cancer research institutions have sounded
such an alarm about cell phone use. But Herberman's advice is sure to
raise concern among many cell phone users and especially parents.
In the memo he sent to about 3,000 faculty and staff Wednesday, he
says children should use cell phones only for emergencies because their
brains are still developing.
Adults should keep the phone away from the head and use the
speakerphone or a wireless headset, he says. He even warns against
using cell phones in public places like a bus because it exposes others
to the phone's electromagnetic fields.
The issue that concerns some scientists — though nowhere near a
consensus — is electromagnetic radiation, especially its possible
effects on children. It is not a major topic in conferences of brain
specialists.
A 2008 University of Utah analysis looked at nine studies —
including some Herberman cites — with thousands of brain tumor patients
and concludes "we found no overall increased risk of brain tumors among
cellular phone users. The potential elevated risk of brain tumors after
long-term cellular phone use awaits confirmation by future studies."
Studies last year in France and Norway concluded the same thing.
"If there is a risk from these products — and at this point we do
not know that there is — it is probably very small," the Food and Drug
Administration says on an agency Web site.
Still, Herberman cites a "growing body of literature linking
long-term cell phone use to possible adverse health effects including
cancer."
"Although the evidence is still controversial, I am convinced that
there are sufficient data to warrant issuing an advisory to share some
precautionary advice on cell phone use," he wrote in his memo.
A driving force behind the memo was Devra Lee Davis, the director of the university's center for environmental oncology.
"The question is do you want to play Russian roulette with your
brain," she said in an interview from her cell phone while using the
hands-free speaker phone as recommended. "I don't know that cell phones
are dangerous. But I don't know that they are safe."
Of concern are the still unknown effects of more than a decade of
cell phone use, with some studies raising alarms, said Davis, a former
health adviser in the Clinton Administration.
She said 20 different groups have endorsed the advice the Pittsburgh
cancer institute gave, and authorities in England, France and India
have cautioned children's use of cell phones.
Herberman and Davis point to a massive ongoing research project
known as Interphone, involving scientists in 13 nations, mostly in
Europe. Results already published in peer-reviewed journals from this
project aren't so alarming, but Herberman is citing work not yet
published.
The published research focuses on more than 5,000 cases of
brain tumors. The National Research Council in the U.S., which isn't
participating in the Interphone project, reported in January that the
brain tumor research had "selection bias." That means it relied on
people with cancer to remember how often they used cell phones. It is
not considered the most accurate research approach.
The largest published study, which appeared in the Journal of
the National Cancer Institute in 2006, tracked 420,000 Danish cell
phone users, including thousands that had used the phones for more than
10 years. It found no increased risk of cancer among those using cell
phones.
A French study based on Interphone research and published in
2007 concluded that regular cell phone users had "no significant
increased risk" for three major types of nervous system tumors. It did
note, however, that there was "the possibility of an increased risk
among the heaviest users" for one type of brain tumor, but that needs
to be verified in future research.
Earlier research also has found no connection.
Joshua E. Muscat of Penn State University, who has studied
cancer and cell phones in other research projects partly funded by the
cell phone industry, said there are at least a dozen studies that have
found no cancer-cell phone link. He said a Swedish study cited by
Herberman as support for his warning was biased and flawed.
"We certainly don't know of any mechanism by which
radiofrequency exposure would cause a cancerous effect in cells. We
just don't know this might possibly occur," Muscat said.
Cell phones emit radiofrequency energy, a type of radiation
that is a form of electromagnetic radiation, according to the National
Cancer Institute. Though studies are being done to see if there is a
link between it and tumors of the brain and central nervous system,
there is no definitive link between the two, the institute says on its
Web site.
"By all means, if a person feels compelled that they should
take precautions in reducing the amount of electromagnetic radio waves
through their bodies, by all means they should do so," said Dan Catena,
a spokesman for the American Cancer Society. "But at the same time, we
have to remember there's no conclusive evidence that links cell phones
to cancer, whether it's brain tumors or other forms of cancer."
Joe Farren, a spokesman for the CTIA-The Wireless Association,
a trade group for the wireless industry, said the group believes there
is a risk of misinforming the public if science isn't used as the
ultimate guide on the issue.
"When you look at the overwhelming majority of studies that
have been peer reviewed and published in scientific journals around the
world, you'll find no relationship between wireless usage and adverse
health affects," Farren said.
Frank Barnes, who chaired the January report from the National
Research Council, said Wednesday that "the jury is out" on how
hazardous long-term cell phone use might be.
Speaking from his cell phone, the professor of electrical and
computer engineering at the University of Colorado at Boulder said he
takes no special precautions in his own phone use. And he offered no
specific advice to people worried about the matter.
It's up to each individual to decide what if anything to do. If
people use a cell phone instead of having a land line, "that may very
well be reasonable for them," he said.
Susan Juffe, a 58-year-old Pittsburgh special education
teacher, heard about Herberman's cell phone advice on the radio earlier
in the day.
"Now, I'm worried. It's scary," she said.
She says she'll think twice about allowing her 10-year-old daughter Jayne to use the cell phone.
"I don't want to get it (brain cancer) and I certainly don't want you to get it," she explained to her daughter.
Sara Loughran, a 24-year-old doctoral student at the University
of Pittsburgh, sat in a bus stop Wednesday chatting on her cell phone
with her mother. She also had heard the news earlier in the day, but
was not as concerned.
"I think if they gave me specific numbers and specific
information and it was scary enough, I would be concerned," Loughran
said, planning to call her mother again in a matter of minutes.
"Without specific numbers, it's too vague to get me worked up."
___
Jennifer Yates reported from Pittsburgh. Science Writer Seth
Borenstein reported from Washington. Reporter Ramit Plushnick-Masti
contributed from Pittsburgh and Science Writer Malcolm Ritter
contributed from New York.
___
On the Net:
Advice from the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute:
http://www.environmentaloncology.org/node/201
Food and Drug Administration on cell phones: http://www.fda.gov/cellphones/qa.html